A post about a comment on a post

So I posted what I found to be a humorous exchange between a first responder and a paramedic that I witnessed not too long ago.

As he is wont to do, TOTW posted a comment on my post. Some times, I think he and my mother are the only ones who actually read my blog, and I enjoy his comments. (Mom never has much to say. She really doesn’t read, anyway.)

He says:

There’s a difference between knowing what’s going on with the monitor and what’s going on with the patient. Unfortunately, a lot of people don’t see that.

And he is right. Absolutely right.

I have always viewed the cardiac monitor as a tool to aid in my diagnosis and treatment, rather than as something that guides my treatment. There is a difference there. A slight and subtle difference, but one that I think is very important.

Really, it is the difference between a cook and a chef.

A cook follows directions, and adds a certain amount of ingredients to a dish at certain times. A chef knows how foods and ingredients interact with each other, and is not afraid to experiment and let the dish guide how he prepares it.

Now I’m getting hungry.

I used to work with this guy. He was a huge jerk. A stereotypical, 50-something Jersey Shore jerk. He used to wear his shirts with several buttons undone so he could show off his manly chest mane, and his gold chains. No, I’m not kidding.

But he was a great clinician, and took very good care of patients.

One day, I asked him if he wanted me to put the monitor on a particularly sick patient.

No, I already know what it is going to say. No need for the monitor just yet.”

That confused me. It confused me a lot. I was a fairly young EMT at the time, and I thought things had to be done a certain way, and here was this guy who was doing it his own way. But what he said later when we talked about it made sense:

“A good assessment will tell you what the monitor will say. A person complaining of chest pain, presenting with Levine’s sign, with pale, diaphoretic skin and weak pulses is going to have a sinus rhythm, perhaps with a first-degree block. Then the 12-lead will show ST elevation. And if it doesn’t, I will be surprised. Granny, with her 47 bottles of medications and nausea and vomiting with an irregular heart beat will be in atrial fibrillation.”

Granted, there are no absolutes in EMS, and people won’t always present the same way. But there is a big difference in reading the monitor and knowing what the monitor will say.

Well, there is one absolute in EMS: nobody will be critically injured in an MVC in which the cars have pulled into a McDonald’s parking lot.

Comments

  1. Thanks for the nice words. I’m glad you fully got what I meant. When I teach 12 Lead interpretation, I always tell the students that the 12 Lead is confirmatory, not diagnostic. Sadly, I think most of them only agree to humor the old guy.

    As I read more and more PCRs, I get more and more pessimistic about the future of EMS. Most PCRs are about 90% boiler plate meant to keep the QA weenies off their backs. Hence we get blood glucose checks on every patient, or 12 Leads on 12 year olds that fell off a bike.

    What I see is technicians, not clinicians. People who do things but have no real understanding of why they are doing or what the potential down sides might be.

    I read PCR that screams out to me cardiac and see that the medics treated the nausea with Zofran, but never gave ASA. People seem to get focused on the technology and forget about talking to the patient or more importantly, listening to the patient. Very often the patient will give you the diagnosis if you just ask a few questions and listen to the answers.

Speak Your Mind

*