RFM Preferred Seating : The brand featuring the office chair heralded as one of the most comfortable office chairs of all time certainly would have been expected to do well this year, and they did not disappoint! It’s hard to top many of the chairs offered by RFM, but they certainly outdid themselves with the chairs from their Verte series. The 22011 Verte Ergonomic Office Chair by RFM and its two sibling chairs from RFM Preferred Seating features a back that molds itself to the shape of the user’s spine, making it one of the most comfortable chairs in existence. They are not alone though! RFM’s mission is to keep designing chairs that are always at the forefront of innovation. Many of their chairs, particularly the Verte, Echelon, and Internet, feature ergonomic design to improve all aspects of the office experience, from comfort to productivity. With a mission like that, its no wonder they’ve done so well this year!
A good office chair provides support, Comfort is very important but aside from that, another equally important thing we need to consider is the support level a chair can provide. Some chairs that have really soft seats, back and so on feel so comfortable the first time we sit on it, but if it does not provide ample support for the body, trust me, you are going to be sick and tired of it after a few hours. This is why the most ideal choice for workplace chairs are often the ergonomically correct ones. They help correct our health problems such as bad posture and poor blood circulation. A good ergonomic chair can also reduce stress and tension on our body by eliminating pressure points. Some ergonomic chairs even encourage movement on the user to keep the blood flowing.
That question was asked of me recently by a pastor we were working with. He had contacted us regarding the worship seating needs of his church, he was operating with a very tight budget, and he wanted a church chair that featured a high degree of quality. As we conversed, I suggested one chair solution that we have placed in several churches that performs very well, possesses great quality and is easy on the budget. The pastor though, even though he loved the price and was pleased with the specifications of the chair, uttered the words above.
Spate also told the reporters he was doing the city a favor, since charging for the chairs would keep the undesirables (read – the poor) out of the parks, thereby keeping the parks sparkling clean and free of loiterers who leave a mess in their wake. The outrage from the New York City press and from philanthropists came swift. Randolph Guggenheimer, the president of the Municipal Council, said he ”saw no good reason for allowing private parties to occupy park grounds and make money through a scheme like this.” The New York City Central Federated Union sent a statement to the press denouncing both Spate and Clausen for their ”hideous actions.” The New York Tribune wrote in an editorial, ”This is only another instance of the hopeless stupidity of the present Park Commission.” The New York Journal also wrote an editorial defending the ”rights of poor people to sit in public park.” However, the New York Times saw no problem in what Spate was doing, as long as ”the prices were regulated properly.”
This new phenomenon was covered extensively and very contentiously, in the following day’s daily New York City newspapers. And the man on the hot seat was the president of the Park Commission – one George C. Clausen. It seemed that a few days earlier, Clausen had been visited in his official Park Commission office by a man named Oscar F. Spate. Spate seemed amiable enough, and he offered Clausen a proposition Clausen saw no difficulty in accepting. It seemed that Spate said he wanted to place comfortable rocking chairs in the parks throughout New York City. And for the privilege of doing so, Spate offered the city the tidy sum of $500 a year.